View Full Version : The Cloistered Cleric
CMonkey
03-05-2003, 10:55 AM
Just wondering where and why the cloistered cleric isn't in the playtest doc, I liked him (and my campaign has one).
CM.
Ariadne
03-05-2003, 07:41 PM
You may use the Adept (DMG) as a cloistered cleric, if you like it. There is no need to describe him especially...
I don't think a cloistered was this good idea of 2nd Edition. IMO there should be no difference between PC and NPC clerics...
ConjurerDragon
03-05-2003, 09:55 PM
Ariadne wrote:
>This post was generated by the Birthright.net message forum.
> You can view the entire thread at: http://www.birthright.net/read.php?TID=1404
>
> Ariadne wrote:
> You may use the Adept (DMG) as a cloistered cleric, if you like it. There is no need to describe him especially...
>
>I don`t think a cloistered was this good idea of 2nd Edition. IMO there should be no difference between PC and NPC clerics...
>
As long as we remember that not all people in cloisters and churches and
temples in Cerilia are clerics, but only a few of them are.
Clerics as members of that class and able to cast divine spells are as
the other character classes rare in Cerilia.
Most people in religious institutions that formerly have been level 0
Cleric NPCs in 2E would be Commoners and Experts, e.g. as scribes.
So there is no difference between NPC and PC clerics, but both are only
a few among the followers of a temple.
bye
Michael Romes
************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
CMonkey
03-07-2003, 12:16 PM
Um, I think you misunderstand. I was refering to the cloistered cleric rules for PCs that Travis Doom had included in his conversion document. Any plans to include them? And if no, why?
CM.
Mark_Aurel
03-07-2003, 01:23 PM
Basically, the monastic version of the cleric was a bit too much of a house rule thing - I still like the idea, but overall, I don't think it's a "BR specific" enough idea to warrant inclusion in the base BR rules.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.