kgauck
01-30-2004, 08:16 AM
I would not use the RB table to calculate bloodline demographics. I would
create a typical realm of NPC`s, and see what that looks like. The RB table
will tend to give players fun players to play, not a distribution of
bloodline demographics. That`s why D&D is always telling us that PC`s are
exceptional character (even in this case, exceptions among the exceptions).
My average of all regents in the Ruins of Empire and half of Havens (169
characters) have an average bloodline of 26.90. The random results of the
RB chart get you a 19.14 character.
It may very well be that a statistical analysis of the 109 characters on my
Taelshore site comes out pretty closely to the RB table, which would be
nice, but I`d put the priority on a realm I made. I do know that one
difference, is that 5% of my characters created are not Great bloodlines. I
doubt 30% are Major too, but without counting, I don`t know for sure.
Kenneth Gauck
kgauck@mchsi.com
create a typical realm of NPC`s, and see what that looks like. The RB table
will tend to give players fun players to play, not a distribution of
bloodline demographics. That`s why D&D is always telling us that PC`s are
exceptional character (even in this case, exceptions among the exceptions).
My average of all regents in the Ruins of Empire and half of Havens (169
characters) have an average bloodline of 26.90. The random results of the
RB chart get you a 19.14 character.
It may very well be that a statistical analysis of the 109 characters on my
Taelshore site comes out pretty closely to the RB table, which would be
nice, but I`d put the priority on a realm I made. I do know that one
difference, is that 5% of my characters created are not Great bloodlines. I
doubt 30% are Major too, but without counting, I don`t know for sure.
Kenneth Gauck
kgauck@mchsi.com