teloft
02-18-2004, 07:38 PM
I was reading about how some DM's like to balance there characters.
even when somone gains a powerfull templet
treat the templet as levels. witch the character now haveto/ or can opt to take.
So lets think about a character thet is not blooded. then bang, he becoms blooded by some mean.
now he would be much more powerfull than anyone else in the group. well thet do not have to be. all thet migth hapen is thet the next level he has to take must be spent on the "templet level"
I belive there is no upper limid on the blood score. but you must have one in order to take "levels"
you will not recive any benifits for your bloodscore (exept the RP colection and spending) unless you have "levels"
Im refering to ecounter level adjustments treaded as levels. So you will use XP for them. has anyone written it out? I would love to see an example.
..
I think the idee is clear. So have there been any treads about this.
even when somone gains a powerfull templet
treat the templet as levels. witch the character now haveto/ or can opt to take.
So lets think about a character thet is not blooded. then bang, he becoms blooded by some mean.
now he would be much more powerfull than anyone else in the group. well thet do not have to be. all thet migth hapen is thet the next level he has to take must be spent on the "templet level"
I belive there is no upper limid on the blood score. but you must have one in order to take "levels"
you will not recive any benifits for your bloodscore (exept the RP colection and spending) unless you have "levels"
Im refering to ecounter level adjustments treaded as levels. So you will use XP for them. has anyone written it out? I would love to see an example.
..
I think the idee is clear. So have there been any treads about this.