Neil Barnes
02-04-1998, 02:43 PM
On Tue, 3 Feb 1998, KAI BESTE wrote:
> Thanks to you all.
> Your input has been very helpful in deciding on my new campaign.
> Almost everybody seems to be in favour of S&P (I had expected mixed
> feelings).
I suspect that those of us who don't like S&P didn't bother to comment
(I've found that good players don't need the rules to add flavour to
PCs, and that having rules like that just encourages munchkin behaviour
- - YMMV, obviously).
I will recommend Spells & Magic (for my money the best of the three
books) - and ask how/ if people have used it with BR?
neil
> Thanks to you all.
> Your input has been very helpful in deciding on my new campaign.
> Almost everybody seems to be in favour of S&P (I had expected mixed
> feelings).
I suspect that those of us who don't like S&P didn't bother to comment
(I've found that good players don't need the rules to add flavour to
PCs, and that having rules like that just encourages munchkin behaviour
- - YMMV, obviously).
I will recommend Spells & Magic (for my money the best of the three
books) - and ask how/ if people have used it with BR?
neil