Matthew M. Colville
01-03-1997, 11:34 AM
Kent Lerch wrote:
>
> Matthew M. Colville wrote:
> "Do what you will with this, but please keep the original authorship
> recognition. The 'Matt' here is not me, but a friend of mine's brother who
> deserves credit where credit is due. Mass Combat System for AD&D created by Matt
> Thomas".
>
> It should be noted that the system presented here is an adaptation of the old
> Chivalry & Sorcery Battlesystem for Paper & Pencil, outlined in the C&S
> Accessory II, using even the same terms as the old C&S Battlesystem does
> (Strategic Stance etc.). I like the adaptation, but considering that Matthew
> reminded us all of keeping the authorship recognition, I felt that a reminder as
> to the >real< original authorship might be appropriate.
That blows my mind! I knew it was *possible* that what Matt had
developed was a bastardization of something else, but I wasn't around
then, and didn't know. What *is* Chivalry and Sorcery?
-Matthew
-
>
> Matthew M. Colville wrote:
> "Do what you will with this, but please keep the original authorship
> recognition. The 'Matt' here is not me, but a friend of mine's brother who
> deserves credit where credit is due. Mass Combat System for AD&D created by Matt
> Thomas".
>
> It should be noted that the system presented here is an adaptation of the old
> Chivalry & Sorcery Battlesystem for Paper & Pencil, outlined in the C&S
> Accessory II, using even the same terms as the old C&S Battlesystem does
> (Strategic Stance etc.). I like the adaptation, but considering that Matthew
> reminded us all of keeping the authorship recognition, I felt that a reminder as
> to the >real< original authorship might be appropriate.
That blows my mind! I knew it was *possible* that what Matt had
developed was a bastardization of something else, but I wasn't around
then, and didn't know. What *is* Chivalry and Sorcery?
-Matthew
-