l.braslow@genie.co
01-08-1997, 04:16 AM
Darkstar --
There's certainly nothing wrong with your approach to playing the
Birthright NPCs, but I personally find it more interesting to have as many
as possible controlled by people who are generally concerned for their well-
being. While a DM may dictate NPC actions to fit his idea of the campaign,
other players will be looking out for their own interests. IMO, this makes
the political situation much more realistic. But in many cases a DM doesn't
have this luxury.
RE: The newsletter/webpage. All these ideas are really great! I'm getting
psyched. ;) The only problem -- we can't legally put it up as a webpage,
unless we are officially liscenced by TSR. I'm sure they would give us
space on MPGN or the new official site, if we asked, but it might be better
to leave things in newsletter form, at least for now. Unless someone wants
to contact TSR about it . . . which would be really cool, but might take a
REALLY long time to get resolved.
Laura
There's certainly nothing wrong with your approach to playing the
Birthright NPCs, but I personally find it more interesting to have as many
as possible controlled by people who are generally concerned for their well-
being. While a DM may dictate NPC actions to fit his idea of the campaign,
other players will be looking out for their own interests. IMO, this makes
the political situation much more realistic. But in many cases a DM doesn't
have this luxury.
RE: The newsletter/webpage. All these ideas are really great! I'm getting
psyched. ;) The only problem -- we can't legally put it up as a webpage,
unless we are officially liscenced by TSR. I'm sure they would give us
space on MPGN or the new official site, if we asked, but it might be better
to leave things in newsletter form, at least for now. Unless someone wants
to contact TSR about it . . . which would be really cool, but might take a
REALLY long time to get resolved.
Laura