Results 1 to 10 of 11
Thread: The Battlefield
Threaded View
-
03-28-2008, 06:43 AM #1
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 439
- Downloads
- 31
- Uploads
- 0
The Battlefield
We have some long-experienced players, students of military history, and just all around creative people here. I am curious as to what people's favorite strategic and tactical warfare systems are.
If not other systems, how satisfied are you by the Birthright resolution rules? (off the battlemat; just the BRCS units and conditional modifiers)
What suggestions do you have for amending these?
I recognize the value of BR's abstract system, allowing many explanations and much GM-arbitrated conditionality. However, desiring a more comprehensive resolution system, I would like to see more and better conditional modifiers (multiple battlefield terrain areas, weather, fatigue, discipline, effectiveness of commanders and communication systems, etc.).
I also think the lack of a logistics system, though quite understandable, leaves a lot to be desired in warfare that is normally determined by logistics issues--in that logistics determines fielded army sizes, concentrations/formations, and strategic targets. Not having supply lines to worry about, fields to forage, or much reason to skirmish, I think we have more pitched battles in BR than is realistic.
But what do you all think?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Chap 6 - Should units be allowed to stack on the battlefield?
By irdeggman in forum BRCS 3.0/3.5 EditionReplies: 36Last Post: 04-24-2008, 04:50 AM -
PCs on the Battlefield (honor and disgrace)
By Birthright-L in forum The Royal LibraryReplies: 0Last Post: 02-08-2004, 08:30 PM -
Charging On The Battlefield
By MJH in forum The Royal LibraryReplies: 4Last Post: 01-04-2004, 06:04 PM
Bookmarks