View Poll Results: Should all (except for creating a 0-level holding) domain actions require RP be spent?
- Voters
- 26. You may not vote on this poll
Results 11 to 12 of 12
-
10-10-2004, 11:13 PM #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- california
- Posts
- 317
- Downloads
- 2
- Uploads
- 0
I votes no for the same reason. If instead the DC for all actions was simply raised by one (base DC 11 rather than 10) you would end up with the exact same drain on RP pools, yet still allow for more active unblooded PC's or NPC's.
Build a man a fire and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
-
10-14-2004, 09:25 AM #12Birthright Developer
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Time to close this poll.
Here are the results:
Should all (except for creating a 0-level holding) domain actions require RP be spent?
(a) Yes [ 16 ] [61.54%]
(B) No [ 10 ] [38.46%]
© Other (please provide suggestions with as much detail as possible) [ 0 ] [0.00%]
(d) Abstain [ 0 ] [0.00%]
Total Votes: 26
Looks like the majority (not quite a clear majority though) wants to require RP to be spent (for at least most) domain actions.
Once the other poll (on basic mechanic for resolving actions) is completed - tomorrow, I'll post the next poll in the series.Duane Eggert
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Tags for this Thread
action,
actions,
arrow,
bastard,
benefit,
box,
brcs,
building,
capture,
champion,
Colin,
conversion,
convert,
cover,
current,
decision,
domain,
domain action,
feat,
feats,
handling,
horse,
mechanic,
modification,
modifiers,
order,
place,
point,
poll,
recent,
revise,
run,
series,
setting,
side,
system,
time,
variant,
variation,
version
Bookmarks