Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: Dwarf Paladin
-
06-14-2005, 05:31 PM #1
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 43
- Downloads
- 44
- Uploads
- 0
I have one suggestion for Variant: Paladins as new classes for Paladins of Moradin in Chapter 1 instead of gaining the ability to summon a small earth elemental for a number of rounds per day equal to his charisma modifier, minimum of 1. I think maybe is better to have skill increase for 2
Skill Points at 1st Level: (4 + Int bonus) x 4.
Skill Points at Each Additional Level: 4 + Int bonus.
Because Dwarfs are skilled craftsmen and it is analog with rule that Paladins of Moradin may freely multiclass as fighters or experts, but not both, without losing their ability to advance as a paladin.Vosgaard's Veliki hrast.
-
06-15-2005, 12:18 AM #2
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
The summon earth elemental was something brought up over a year ago IIRC and was generally seen as favorable, once toned down some.
I think these are some links to discussions on classes (might have missed the pertinant one on dwarven paladins though - there was a lot of discussion).
http://www.birthright.net/forums/ind...showtopic=2363
http://www.birthright.net/forums/ind...showtopic=2674
http://www.birthright.net/forums/ind...showtopic=2317
As far as getting more skill points, wouldn't that be the purpose of the freely multiclass concept since experts get more skill points than do paladins? 6 vice 2. So it is inherently included in this already.Duane Eggert
-
06-15-2005, 10:50 PM #3
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Blackgate, Danigau
- Posts
- 87
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Seems like a good house rule. Low skill points are always a bit more painful in BR. Seems balanced. Fits thematically too. And earth elementals might not fit the mood of your dwarves. Never particularly liked elementals myself...
Interesting idea.
-
06-16-2005, 12:04 AM #4
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 43
- Downloads
- 44
- Uploads
- 0
Thanks,
I never liked to see Summoning and Outsiders in Birthright.Vosgaard's Veliki hrast.
-
06-16-2005, 01:11 AM #5
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Blackgate, Danigau
- Posts
- 87
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
06-16-2005, 09:44 AM #6
-
06-16-2005, 10:46 AM #7
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
And in 3.5 the special mount is handled substantially different than in previous versions:
from the SRD:
Special Mount (Sp): Upon reaching 5th level, a paladin gains the service of an unusually intelligent, strong, and loyal steed to serve her in her crusade against evil (see below). This mount is usually a heavy warhorse (for a Medium paladin) or a warpony (for a Small paladin).
Once per day, as a full-round action, a paladin may magically call her mount from the celestial realms in which it resides. This ability is the equivalent of a spell of a level equal to one-third the paladin’s level. The mount immediately appears adjacent to the paladin and remains for 2 hours per paladin level; it may be dismissed at any time as a free action. The mount is the same creature each time it is summoned, though the paladin may release a particular mount from service.
Each time the mount is called, it appears in full health, regardless of any damage it may have taken previously. The mount also appears wearing or carrying any gear it had when it was last dismissed. Calling a mount is a conjuration (calling) effect.
Should the paladin’s mount die, it immediately disappears, leaving behind any equipment it was carrying. The paladin may not summon another mount for thirty days or until she gains a paladin level, whichever comes first, even if the mount is somehow returned from the dead. During this thirty-day period, the paladin takes a –1 penalty on attack and weapon damage rolls.
A paladin’s mount is treated as a magical beast, not an animal, for the purpose of all effects that depend on its type (though it retains an animal’s HD, base attack bonus, saves, skill points, and feats).
Also from the SRD:
Summon Monster I
Conjuration (Summoning) [see text]
Level: Brd 1, Clr 1, Sor/Wiz 1
Components: V, S, F/DF
Casting Time: 1 round
Range: Close (25 ft. + 5 ft./2 levels)
Effect: One summoned creature
Duration: 1 round/level (D)
Saving Throw: None
Spell Resistance: No
This spell summons an extraplanar creature (typically an outsider, elemental, or magical beast native to another plane). It appears where you designate and acts immediately, on your turn. It attacks your opponents to the best of its ability. If you can communicate with the creature, you can direct it not to attack, to attack particular enemies, or to perform other actions.
The spell conjures one of the creatures from the 1st-level list on the accompanying Summon Monster table. You choose which kind of creature to summon, and you can change that choice each time you cast the spell.
A summoned monster cannot summon or otherwise conjure another creature, nor can it use any teleportation or planar travel abilities. Creatures cannot be summoned into an environment that cannot support them.
When you use a summoning spell to summon an air, chaotic, earth, evil, fire, good, lawful, or water creature, it is a spell of that type.
Arcane Focus: A tiny bag and a small (not necessarily lit) candle.
Note that it resides on the celestial realms (re: plane) and is a magical creature. As I read it the essential difference between the summoning and calling subschools are that the calling brings a specific creature while the summoning brings a generic one (i.e., not the same one every time). But otherwise the two are prettymuch identical (which is why they are the same school after all).
Also from the SRD:
Elemental Type: An elemental is a being composed of one of the four classical elements: air, earth, fire, or water.
Features: An elemental has the following features.
—8-sided Hit Dice.
—Base attack bonus equal to 3/4 total Hit Dice (as cleric).
—Good saves depend on the element: Fortitude (earth, water) or Reflex (air, fire).
—Skill points equal to (2 + Int modifier, minimum 1) per Hit Die, with quadruple skill points for the first Hit Die.
Traits: An elemental possesses the following traits (unless otherwise noted in a creature’s entry).
—Darkvision out to 60 feet.
—Immunity to poison, sleep effects, paralysis, and stunning.
—Not subject to critical hits or flanking.
—Unlike most other living creatures, an elemental does not have a dual nature—its soul and body form one unit. When an elemental is slain, no soul is set loose. Spells that restore souls to their bodies, such as raise dead, reincarnate, and resurrection, don’t work on an elemental. It takes a different magical effect, such as limited wish, wish, miracle, or true resurrection, to restore it to life.
—Proficient with natural weapons only, unless generally humanoid in form, in which case proficient with all simple weapons and any weapons mentioned in its entry.
—Proficient with whatever type of armor (light, medium, or heavy) that it is described as wearing, as well as all lighter types. Elementals not indicated as wearing armor are not proficient with armor. Elementals are proficient with shields if they are proficient with any form of armor.
—Elementals do not eat, sleep, or breathe.
Magical Beast Type: Magical beasts are similar to animals but can have Intelligence scores higher than 2. Magical beasts usually have supernatural or extraordinary abilities, but sometimes are merely bizarre in appearance or habits.
Features: A magical beast has the following features.
—10-sided Hit Dice.
—Base attack bonus equal to total Hit Dice (as fighter).
—Good Fortitude and Reflex saves.
—Skill points equal to (2 + Int modifier, minimum 1) per Hit Die, with quadruple skill points for the first Hit Die.
Traits: A magical beast possesses the following traits (unless otherwise noted in a creature’s entry).
—Darkvision out to 60 feet and low-light vision.
—Proficient with its natural weapons only.
—Proficient with no armor.
—Magical beasts eat, sleep, and breathe.
IMO one of the main reasons that paladins of Nesire didn't get mounts in 2nd ed was that it didn't fit very well, since once the mount was found it stayed around forever (i.e., it wasn't summoned) - so if a character went into a dungeon or on a ship for an extended period of time - the mount had to wait outside until the character came back - very awkward and difficult to handle. In 3.5 the mount is basically "stored" on the celestial plane until needed, so really there is no reason that paladins of nesire or moradin couldn't use the standard paladin mount ability. The basic difference would be how much use would the paladin get from the mount - since the mount is one of the more substanital benefits a paladin gets. Also the info on alternate mounts is not in the core books so some other book, issue of Dragon (IIRC) or something else would have to be used to come up with a substitute (more suitable) mount.Duane Eggert
-
08-20-2005, 11:18 PM #8
Dwarf Paladin
At 11:44 AM 6/16/2005 +0200, RaspK_FOG wrote:
>The reason the suggested idea is largely favoured is because a paladin is
>able to summon a steed, which would be awkward for dwarves... And you have
>to agree that extra skill points seem more flavourless than the ability to
>summon a creature of pure earth for a nearly stone-made race.
Summoning extra-planar creatures is problematic in BR for three main
reasons. The first has to do with the nature true magic and the various
ways that theme interacts with character class. Though there are divine
summonings (and the paladin class is definitely divine) the ability to
summon a steed is probably best associated to the arcane spell _Mount_. Of
course, that spell is a 1st level wiz/sor spell, so it wouldn`t qualify as
true magic, but the more powerful (and scaling) system of paladin`s
warhorse special ability is probably 3rd level and up if one were using a
progressive system of magic, which would make the ability an exception to
the arcane magic restrictions of the setting. There are divine summoning
spells for elemental creatures, so a dwarven ability to summon an elemental
is less of a problem in this regard, but since the ability itself appears
to be more arcane than divine it seems incongruent for character classes
specific to the BR setting to employ a special ability that has
questionable characteristics in relation to the BR specific themes.
Even with the arcane aspect of magic in BR in consideration there is also
the problem of extra-planar creatures in the setting, which are often
avoided or, more accurately, made unique campaign themes rather than
general class abilities. My opinion is that this is related to the basic
planar structure of the campaign, where Aebrynis is meant to be "cut off"
from the rest of the standard D&D cosmology by the Shadow World which acts
as a buffer between the world and the rest of the planes of
existence. Where one can see a divinely summoned warhorse as being
something more closely rooted to the material plane an elemental is
particularly extra-planar, so is a bit difficult to jibe with the
"isolated" nature of the BR setting.
The last thematic problem with summoning for paladins has to do with the
general "magical" nature of the setting being ramped up a bit. That is, if
paladins have a magical ability to *poof* a large creature into existence
with nary an "abracadabra" it does give the setting a very particular kind
of odor, if you will. From a role-playing standpoint, I`ve imagined that
the summoning of a paladin`s warhorse is meant to be like the Lone Ranger
(who is probably really a paladin in D&D terms--which is funny because
another Western TV show called "Paladin" features a character who is
probably really more of a D&D ranger) whistling for his trusty mount Silver
who inexplicably comes galloping around a nearby tree, boulder, out of a
nearby barn, etc. and when not called upon is banished to the benign and
safe dimension called "Off-camera." Silver doesn`t just *poof* into or out
of existence per se, but his appearances and exits are part of the "magic"
of television editing and the audience`s suspension of
disbelief. Unfortunately, the ability doesn`t really read like that in the
D&D materials, and even if one does interpret the process as being more
like the Lone Ranger calling on Silver than a wizard pulling a rabbit out
of a hat, the whole process has a sort of campy vibe that I`ve associated
(much to the chagrin of other BR community posters) with Forgotten Realms
in the past. It just doesn`t really fit into the BR themes very well. BR
tends to be darker and more rational than other, more high magic
settings. Nobody bats an eye at a character summoning a mount in FR, but
in BR it is a more startling ability. BR paladins are darker and of
questionable morality since they are dedicated to (sometimes quite violent)
gods with different than the standard alignments and spheres, so a white
horse appearing in either a magical shower of flickering lights or by
galloping around the corner doesn`t really jibe, and it gets even weirder
if the creature that arrives is a giant, stoney humanoid.
In the original BR materials the ability to summon a warhorse was traded
off for paladin`s of Nesirie, so there is precedent for swapping this
particular ability out. Personally, I find the whole 2 hour/level
"summoning" of the warhorse to be a bit of a stretch and prefer to simply
allow paladins to "call" their warhorse as the class originally did,
because that avoids all of the above aspects of the issue and is more
easily associated with things like the Leadership feat, so it should be
dropped for all BR paladins. I`d also prefer if the religious aspect of BR
dwarves was simply reflected by allowing them to freely multi-class as both
fighters and clerics rather than giving them their own paladin class--which
is not really indicated anywhere in the original BR materials, and whose
appearance in the update has yet to be very well explained. That would
avoid the whole issue, give them the ability to perform very similar
abilities to paladins using feats and their turning ability, maintain
parity with the original materials, and better reflect most of the
methodology that was expressly used to create the update in the first place.
Gary
-
08-20-2005, 11:18 PM #9
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Columbus, Ohio, United States
- Posts
- 440
- Downloads
- 20
- Uploads
- 0
Dwarf Paladin
If one has access to some of the really old Lone Ranger stuff, he and
Tonto actually *quested" for a mysterious horse (my dad kept some of his old
45rpm LR records-- and some of it has stayed with me). Were I to ever DM a
paladin, that`s the model I would rather use.
In a message dated 6/16/05 9:07:54 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
geeman@SOFTHOME.NET writes:
<< From a role-playing standpoint, I`ve imagined that
the summoning of a paladin`s warhorse is meant to be like the Lone Ranger
(who is probably really a paladin in D&D terms--....
In the original BR materials the ability to summon a warhorse was traded
off for paladin`s of Nesirie, so there is precedent for swapping this
particular ability out. >>
I concur with those who would swap out the Mount ability for Nesirie and
Moradin paladins. {On a side note, I wouldn`t mind the option to swap it out
for any paladin, it ties them almost solely to the armor-and-lance model for
my tastes}
I don`t really like elementals, either, so if I ran a dwarf game, I`d try
to find something else, too.
Lee.
-
08-20-2005, 11:18 PM #10
Dwarf Paladin
At 11:47 AM 6/16/2005 -0400, Lee wrote:
> I concur with those who would swap out the Mount ability for Nesirie
> and Moradin paladins. {On a side note, I wouldn`t mind the option to
> swap it out for any paladin, it ties them almost solely to the
> armor-and-lance model for my tastes}
> I don`t really like elementals, either, so if I ran a dwarf game, I`d
> try to find something else, too.
Personally, I like the ability to quest for a warhorse (or otherwise gain
one through something like the Leadership feat) as a more generic ability
rather than specific to the paladin class. One can, for instance, easily
picture a ranger having the kind of relationship with his mount that is
often associated with paladin`s, and not every "holy warrior" character
need necessarily have a mount as the paladin class describes.
Gary
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks